You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘multiplayer online games’ tag.

Figure – A comic strip by Randall Munroe (at – a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language) about Computational Complexity, the Travelling Salesman (TSP) problem, and – last, but not least – about crowd-sourcing the whole thing into ebay! … LOL

… hey wait, just before you ROTFL yourself on the floor, just check this out. For some problem cases it might just work. Here is one of those  recent cases: Interactive, online games are being used to crack complex scientific conundrums, says a report in Nature. And the wisdom of the ‘multiplayer’ crowd is delivering a new set of search strategies for the prediction of protein structures. The problem at hands is nothing less than protein folding, not an easy one. You can check Nature‘s journal video here. While the online game in question is known as Foldit (link – image below).

Figure – Solving puzzle #48 with FOLDIT, the online game.

There are a lot of consequences with this approach. Here from an article of the Spanish El Pais newspaper (in, Malen Ruiz de Elvira, “Los humanos ganan a los ordenadores – Un juego en red para resolver un problema biológico obtiene mejores resultados que un programa informático“, El Pais, Madrid – August 8, 2010):

[…] Miles de jugadores en red, la mayoría no especializados, han demostrado resolver mejor la forma que adoptan las proteínas que los programas informáticos más avanzados, han hallado científicos de la Universidad de Washington (en Seattle). Averiguar cómo se pliegan las largas cadenas de aminoácidos de las proteínas en la naturaleza -su estructura en tres dimensiones- es uno de los grandes problemas de la biología actual, al que numerosos equipos dedican enormes recursos informáticos. […] Sin embargo la predicción por ordenador de la estructura de una proteína representa un desafío muy grande porque hay que analizar un gran número de posibilidades hasta alcanzar la solución, que se corresponde con un estado óptimo de energía. Es un proceso de optimización. […] Para comprobar su pericia, los científicos plantearon a los jugadores 10 problemas concretos de estructuras de proteínas que conocían pero que no se habían hecho públicas. Encontraron que en algunos de estos casos, concretamente cinco, el resultado alcanzado por los mejores jugadores fue más exacto que el de Rosetta. En otros tres casos las cosas quedaron en tablas y en dos casos ganó la máquina. […] Además, las colaboraciones establecidas entre algunos de los jugadores dieron lugar a todo un nuevo surtido de estrategias y algoritmos, algunos de los cuales se han incorporado ya al programa informático original. “Tan interesantes como las predicciones de Foldit son la complejidad, la variedad y la creatividad que muestra el proceso humano de búsqueda”, escriben los autores del trabajo, entre los que figuran, algo insólito en un artículo científico, “los jugadores de Foldit”. […] “Estamos en el inicio de una nueva era, en la que se mezcla la computación de los humanos y las máquinas”, dice Michael Kearns, un experto en el llamado pensamiento distribuido. […]

Video – Matthew Todd lecture at Google Tech Talk April, 2010 – Open Science: how can we crowdsource chemistry to solve important problems?

The idea of course, is not new. All these distributed human learning systems, started with the SETI at home project (link), originally launched in 1999, by the Berkeley University in California. But I would like to drawn your attention, instead, to some other works on it. First is a video by Matthew Todd (School of Chemistry, University of Sydney). His question his apparently simple: how can we crowdsource chemistry to solve important problems? (above). Second, a well known introductory paper on Crowd-Sourcing by Daren C. Brabham (2008), with several worldwide examples:

[…] Abstract: Crowdsourcing is an online, distributed problem-solving and production model that has emerged in recent years. Notable examples of the model include Threadless, iStockphoto, Inno-Centive, the Goldcorp Challenge, and user-generated advertising contests. This article provides an introduction to crowdsourcing, both its theoretical grounding and exemplar cases, taking care to distinguish crowdsourcing from open source production. This article also explores the possibilities for the model, its potential to exploit a crowd of innovators, and its potential for use beyond for-profit sectors. Finally, this article proposes an agenda for research into crowdsourcing. […] in Daren C. Brabham, “Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving – An Introduction and Cases“, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, London, Los Angeles, New Delhi and Singapore Vol 14(1): 75-90, 2008.


[...] People should learn how to play Lego with their minds. Concepts are building bricks [...] V. Ramos, 2002.

@ViRAms on Twitter

  • RT @whyvert: An experiment that IQ → cooperation: In a repeated prisoner's dilemma game, the high IQ group cooperated far more than the low… | 1 day ago
  • RT @ValerioCapraro: What makes a cooperative society? - Good heart? Adherence to social norms? Intelligence? - A new paper in J Political E… | 1 day ago
  • RT @mikenning: Saw this on a machine learning page. @j2bryson You'll like this. | 2 days ago
  • RT @zackbloom: We live in a post-parody society where it's impossible to invent anything more ridiculous than reality… | 3 days ago
  • RT @ricard_sole: When synthetic networks are artificially evolved to achieve larger complexity, a natural compromise between modularity and… | 6 days ago
  • RT @alexvespi: New paper analyze the “connection between the way in which individuals explore new resources and exploit known assets in the… | 1 week ago
  • RT @ricard_sole: Living systems seem to inhabit the critical boundary separating order from disorder. Why is that? How do they get there? H… | 1 week ago
  • RT @barabasi: @aaronclauset Every 5 years someone is shocked to re-discover that a pure power law does not fit many networks. True: Real ne… | 1 week ago
  • RT @janeygak: The idea of financial planning began with the raising of livestock. Why? It required an extraordinary level of mathematical s… | 1 week ago
  • RT @aaronclauset: 👏 I was rejected by 9 of 11 graduate schools I applied to, 5 of 6 postdocs, and 11 of 12 faculty jobs. Luck has a huge ro… | 1 week ago


Blog Stats

  • 247,249 hits